For more information contact:
Abigail Caplovitz, Legislative Advocate, 609-394-8155 x320
The New
Jersey Identity Theft Prevention Act
Assembly
Sponsors: Asw. Watson Coleman and Asm. Cryan
Senate Sponsors:
Senators Turner, Baer, Vitale, Kavanaugh and Ciesla
Senate Committee Substitute For Senate No. 1914, 2154, 2155, 2440, 2441 and
2524
ID Theft, The Fastest
Growing Financial Crime in NJ
Banks, credit card companies, and other financial institutions are collecting
more data about us than ever. These companies are careless with our data, making
it easy for thieves to steal our identities. In the first four months of this
year, corporations and universities have confessed to exposing approximately
3.5 million Americans to the risk of ID theft. (See Table 1. ) Identity theft
has become an epidemic; based on FTC numbers, an estimated 218,000 New Jerseyans
were victimized in 2004 alone.
Armed with the personal
details of our lives, thieves steal our money electronically, use our credit
cards, and take out new credit in our names. The Identity Theft Prevention Act
addresses all these problems in comprehensive, potent, and yet simple ways.
The Identity Theft Prevention
Act Prevents New Account Fraud
New account fraud occurs when a thief uses your personal information to take
out new credit in your name. This kind of fraud relies on credit reporting agencies'
willingness to sell your credit report to anyone with a few bits of your personal
information. This bill empowers New Jerseyans to prevent new account fraud by
giving them a Security Freeze.
• A Security Freeze is the
right to control access your own credit report by protecting it with a passcode,
akin to your ATM PIN. A potential creditor won't issue credit without reviewing
your credit report, and if only you can grant access to your credit report,
thieves won't be able to get new credit in your name, regardless of how much
of your personal information data companies let them steal. With the right to
a Security Freeze, New Jerseyans can end new account fraud.
According to the Federal
Trade Commission:
New Account Fraud Costs
Much More Than Existing Account Fraud.
• New account fraud cost
business $10,200/victim, for a one year total of $32.9 billion, while existing
account fraud cost business $2,100/victim for a one year total of $14.0 billion.
• On top of the cost to
business, new account fraud cost victims an average $1,180, for a one year total
of $3.8 billion, versus $160 each for victims of existing account fraud, and
a one year total of $1.1 billion.
The Consequences Of New
Account Fraud Are More Severe.
• New account fraud victims
are much more likely than other victims to suffer the following other difficulties:
credit card problems, harassment by a debt collector, loan rejection, banking
problems, insurance rejection, utilities cut off, civil suit filed against them,
and a criminal investigation.
• New account fraud victims
are more likely to be concerned about future misuse of their information (47 percent
of victims versus 36 percent, page. 15)
The Problems From New
Account Fraud Are Harder To Resolve
• On average victims of
new account fraud spent 60 hours resolving their problems, while victims of
existing account fraud spent only 15 hours. (Table 2)
• New account fraud takes
longer to resolve, with 39 percent taking three or more months versus 9 percent for existing
credit card fraud.
The Types Of New Account
Fraud Are Very Diverse Making It Hard To Anticipate Risks
• All of these types of
accounts were fraudulently opened: credit cards, loans, telephone service, checking
and savings accounts, internet accounts, insurance, and other. Also, identity
thieves sometimes rented housing in victims' names, a transaction that is not
new account fraud, strictly speaking, but does involve a credit report check.
New Jerseyans In Particular
Can Benefit From Using A Security Freeze
• According to the FTC's
2004 report of identity theft in New Jersey, 49.1 percent of the different reported
fraudulent transactions could have been prevented with a freeze, as compared
to 37.7 percent nationally.
The Identity Theft Prevention
Act Reduces Existing Account Fraud
Existing account fraud occurs when a thief shops with your credit cards or steals
from your bank account electronically. If companies took better care of your
data, this thievery would be limited. This bill fights existing account fraud
theft by forcing companies to tighten data practices and notify you if the company
gives thieves access to your personal information.
• The bill limits the use
of your social security number; requires thorough document destruction when
personal information is discarded; and requires notification if New Jerseyans'
personal information is compromised.
The Identity Theft Prevention
Act Helps Victims Clear Their Names
ID Theft victims need a police report to prove their victimization to credit
card companies and others. Well intentioned police departments often refuse
to take such reports because the crime did not occur in their jurisdiction,
creating a bureaucratic nightmare for victims.
• The bill requires police
departments to take ID theft police reports from people living in their jurisdictions
without requiring that police assume jurisdiction of the crime.
Table 1: Identities Reported
Compromised by Careless Companies Since Jan. 1, 2005
| COMPANY |
APPROX. NUMBER OF
IDENTITIES COMPROMISED |
DATE REPORTED |
| Bank of America |
1.2 million |
Feb. 2005 |
| Lexis/Nexis |
310,000 |
Mar. 2005 |
| San Jose Medical Group
|
185,000 |
Apr. 2005 |
| HBSC |
180,000 |
Apr. 2005 |
| ChoicePoint |
145,000 |
Feb. 2005 |
| DSW Shoe Warehouse |
1.4 million credit
cards, 96,000 driver's licenses and bank accounts |
Mar. 2005 |
| PayMaxx |
100,000 |
Feb. 2005 |
| Science Applications
International Corp. (SAIC) |
45,000+ (employees
plus current and former stockholders) |
Feb. 2005 |
| Valley Wide Financial
Services |
1,200 |
Mar. 2005 |
| T-Mobile |
400 |
January 2005 |
| Ameritrade |
200,000 |
Apr. 2005 |
| Wachovia, B of A, PNC
Financial, Commerce Bank |
680,000 |
Apr. 2005 |
| Time Warner |
600,000 |
Apr. 2005 |
|
Westborough
Bank
|
750 |
Apr. 2005 |
| Calif. Fast Track |
4,500 |
Apr. 2005 |
| CitiFinancial |
3.9 million |
June 2005 |
| Total: |
8,951,850 Id's Compromised
|
Reported Since Jan.
1, 2005 |
| |
|
|
Note: "Identities
Compromised" is the number of people whom the companies involved deemed to be
sufficiently at risk to warrant notifying; in some cases that number reflects
only a portion of the database accessed by the identity thief. For example,
the T-Mobile incident involved a thief taking 400 identities from a database
of 16.3 million. The fact that only 400 people were seriously affected reflects
the fact that the thief was caught before he could steal more; the thief had
the opportunity, if not apprehended, to steal all 16.3 million identities.